Gaslighting – the attempt to destroy another’s sanity and
grasp on reality – has come back under scrutiny with coercive relationships
openly discussed and dramatized in The Girl on a Train and in Helen’s domestic
abuse in BBC radio’s The Archers. Add on top a US President who routinely
accuses others of transgressions he is more guilty of himself and it begins to
look like a malaise of our time.
Being on the
receiving end of blatant misrepresentation, a twisting of facts to make the
gaslighter appear saintly and the victim at fault, is head-screwing. Partly I
suspect since initially you can’t believe that anyone could be so overt and
shameless. Confrontations brew up a storm of rage so the unwilling recipient
withdraws into a frightened acquiescence. There’s only room for one reality and
it isn’t the real one.
I survived one such
prolonged psychic assault until eventually baling with the steely thought that
‘no one destroys me’. Others aren’t so lucky, are more dependent, feel they
have no choices. Women especially are conditioned to take guilt on board too
easily though it’s not really gender specific.
Understanding the
underlying psychological mechanism that drives such behaviour won’t solve the
problem, but it can help to make an intolerable situation bearable or open up
the possibility of escape.
Which returns to the
subject of last week’s blog – that we are abysmally unaware of how the mind
develops and works, or in this case gets road-blocked early on. This isn’t
stuff that tinkering with thinking habits will straighten out.
In the chaos and
turmoil of a baby turned toddler’s inner life, there is an understandable drive
to build solid self-esteem. What happens to the bad feelings of shame and anger
that threaten to undermine the fragile edifice? Give them to someone else. I’m
wonderful, you’re at fault. Rather than integrating the great and not so great
characteristics into a whole person.
What develops is a false self-image, dependent on others, essential as
carriers of the what-I-can’t-face-about-myself bits.
It can also work the
other way round as the I’m-perfect part is projected onto an ideal hero,
leaving the individual feeling constantly inferior; and the figure on the
pedestal inflated way beyond their worth.
Both are ways of
handling the toxic package that is shame, the earliest and most corrosive of
emotions. Feeling guilty about an action or a thought is uncomfortable. I’m ashamed of being me is a whole different
ball game, eroding self-worth out of existence.
The narcissist
gaslighter and victim have problems with humiliation and self-disgust. One
disavows it completely, the other accepts it as proof positive of what they’ve
always suspected. Neither sees themselves are they really are - individual human beings with pluses and
minuses.
Brainwashing to
impose a distorted reality is a fascist dictator or cult chief’s modus
operandi. The susceptible are swept up in the idealised delusion that the great
leader knows all, even in the face of a mountain of evidence to the contrary.
Naysayers have to be discredited by smears, slander or more extreme methods.
There can be no room for doubt and uncertainty. Group-think rules, with no
variation from the accepted one, to prop up the ruler’s grandiosity and to give
the subjects a sense of belonging and identity.
Christopher Bollas,
the London analyst, talks of the ‘empty heart’ of such personalities who
project their ‘dead core self’ onto the victim who then becomes ‘a disposable
nonentity.’ And behind it all there is overwhelming rage which threatens to
obliterate the leader’s personality altogether if they were to face their inner
desolation. The split between the I’m-the-greatest self and the I’m-nothing is
too immense to be bridged.
A compelling and
helpful analogy was drawn between such personalities and artists by French
analyst Janine Chasseguet-Smirgel. Her take was that both recreate reality to
suit themselves. Not that narcissists and perverts are necessarily creative
except in this regard – they shy away from an unbearable world to invent their
own fantasy land with themselves on the throne.
In the original
1944 Gas Light movie, based on Patrick Hamilton’s play, the beleaguered wife
eventually shops her husband to the police but not before she tortures him by
doing as she was done unto. A taste of his own medicine. What prevents some
downtrodden, manipulated spouses from taking revenge is a sense deep down that
they are dealing with an incapable and damaged infant in an adult body. Pity as
well as fear holds them in place. They also start from a place of low
self-esteem which the narcissist homes in on like a wasp to a jam-jar.
As an
inter-personal dilemma there are no simple choices. The narcissist is the least
likely to seek treatment. Their false sense of superiority prevents them
admitting to any imperfection. Below that lies an empty chasm which threatens
to devour them and has to be avoided at all costs. The coerced one, their trash
receptacle, is left with making what feels like a selfish choice to put
themselves first or stay imprisoned as a pawn on a malign chess board.
Out in the
political and cultural world? All of us are guilty of assuming someone else has
THE answer or is leading the perfect life to which we can never aspire,
shutting our ears and eyes to anything that might topple our idol from their
pedestal. Truthfully it’s our pedestal. We put them there. Cut them down to
human size and life seems duller without celeb glitz and harder work having to
find our own answers. We all project
what we don’t like or refuse to own about ourselves. There’s a tiny part of
everyone wrapped up in the better and worse tangle.
Every week I think I
must find a funny blog topic to sparkle up the week. Next week, I promise – to myself.
Follow me on:
BUY my new crime thriller BY the LIGHT of a LIE at:
www.marjorieorr.com
No comments:
Post a Comment