Sunday 25 March 2018

Setting free your inner novelist


All of us dream and everyone, they say, has a novel in them. Yet few turn their fantasies into fiction. Tomorrow and tomorrow is always the excuse as the petty distractions of life get in the way. As Disraeli observed, most die with their music locked up inside them. 

  Even those of us who gear up our courage and stamina for the marathon of finishing full-length novels, the monster Doubt looms large, throwing obstacles and diversions in our way. Easier to get the shopping, washing, gardening, paperwork sorted first. Then there’ll be time and head space. At which point fate steps in with what the French call deviations, a can’t-be-ignored road block which requires yet another detour away from the dream.

   If memory serves me correctly Beethoven once said his problem wasn’t a musicians’ block, it was the opposite. As soon as he stepped out of bed, notes flooded into his head. For lesser mortals the muse is not so obliging - a faint siren call, all too easily silenced. The risks of foundering on the sharp rocks of disappointment and humiliation loom large. Best to keep our precious inner world away from the reefs.

   In astrology and Jungian psychology, the stander on the threshold is a key archetypal figure. One who can dive into the unconscious realm of visions and fantasies and re-emerge to craft them into tangible form. The old glyph for the sign of Capricorn, deigned to have this rare talent, was a goat with a fish tail – a hybrid creature of water and earth. Though to be picky, it would not be entirely efficient in either. Mermaids can’t live on land and a two-legged horned beast dragging a scaly appendage behind wouldn’t get up too many mountains. Still as symbolism it makes sense. 

   Capricornians are notoriously materialistic and ambitious, cold business types who disavow all feeling to get to the top. Yet they are also creative. All successful commercial enterprises start with an idea, which after much struggle, overcoming setbacks and hurdles, is turned into money.  The artier version of this might take note of the long-game mindset which is crucial - accepting that the route to the top of your chosen peak will always be a winding path, with reverses, sheer drops, insurmountable obstacles which have to be circumnavigated, while always keeping the end goal in mind. 

   To amble off down a side road for a moment I was struck by a story told by Black Elk, a medicine and holy man of the Lakota Sioux in the USA. He had a childhood vision of visiting the centre of the earth where he met with the Grandfathers of the six sacred directions – east, west, north, south, above and below. This set him apart as a healer and wise man and was experienced by him as a protection. When he fought in the Battle of Wounded Knee in 1890, he said he knew he would not be harmed if he kept his vision in mind. Only when it slipped at one point was he grazed by a bullet. Sceptics may scorn but there is a moral imperative wrapped up in the tale – do not lose sight of your inner guiding daemon.

   Back in the 21st century, the knotty problem of turning on the tap to let your muse run free remains. Years ago I wrote an autobiography that I knew could never be published – too zany, off-the-wall and slanderous. The words poured onto paper in a gushing stream every spare hour I could salvage from earning a living. No schedule. No blocked-off-mornings-for- writing strictures. It switched on any time with an exhilarating swoosh. 

  Occasionally you read of authors who have had the same unstoppable flow and finished their novel within weeks. More often writers talk of the arduous task of hewing words and ideas ‘out of a void’ and ten years later they finally type The End on their opus.

   I’m trying to find a less crass term than laxative as an aid to speeding up writers’ flow. Maybe it’s the wrong metaphor. Juggling structure with creativity is more where it’s at. Not just structure in the novel but in life. And finding the right balance with the genie that is pleading to be let out of its cage.  To take the risk there needs to be an element of desperation behind any creative enterprise. An itch that can’t be cured, almost an addiction. 

   Aminatta Forna (The Memory of Love, The Hired Man, Happiness) describes writing novels “as taking a thought for walk.” A Forrest Gump-sized three year 19,000 mile walk. Persistence, endurance and the will-power to walk through your personal ‘wall’ of exhaustion and cowardice is all it takes. Simple, then.      
  


Follow me on:
BUY my new crime thriller BY the LIGHT of a LIE at: www.marjorieorr.com
 


Sunday 18 March 2018

A magic mind-changer for the ignorant ones


Ever prayed for a magic mind-changer in the middle of an argument? A remote control that could zap the brain of the ignorant one who discounts all your carefully researched facts as fakes and refuses to listen to common sense. Problem is in their neanderthal cave, they’ll be thinking exactly the same in reverse.

   Starting from the optimistic assumption that we are all fair-minded souls keen to expand our knowledge base and find the answer to puzzling dilemmas, there should be a way to reach a consensus. It shouldn’t be this hard. And yet it is, even tossing to one side those of malign agenda with something to hide, or those so paranoid their optics are warped. 

   Families are pulled apart by the pro and anti-Trump argument, or in the UK, Brexiteers shouting down Remainers, never mind the Scottish/Irish independence versus unionists hostilities; climate change deniers and proponent - the list goes on. At an individual level, marriage counsellors must find their heads spinning trying to cope with two completely disparate takes on the same unhappy story. Different football match played on a different ground altogether, according to the warring spouses. 

    Bitter polarities magnify once you move, at your peril, into science arguments. Opponents of accepted theories who step forward with new insights can be destroyed by the vehemence of attacks on their credibility. Forget the naive notion that scientists are on an open-minded voyage of discovery. They hang onto the status quo with the desperation of drowning men fighting off sharks.

  Why so? What is so threatening about opening your mind to an alternative viewpoint? Progress is about knowing more, not sitting paralysed in same old same old. Arthur Schopenhauer, the 19th Century philosopher was clear about the tortuous process of expanding and changing minds.  “All truth passes through three stages.  First, it is ridiculed.  Second it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."  What’s worse, the protracted battle for acknowledgement that ‘hey, they might have something there’ doesn’t win the argument on its own. Depressingly, Max Planck, the physicist, pointed out, “A new … truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light but rather because its opponents eventually die, a new generation grows up that is familiar with it." 

    Forget trying to batter sense into a blockhead, just wait till they keel over. It’s a miracle that humanity has survived as long as it has. Though it may explain millenia of violent conflict in which victory depends on the destruction of your opponent. 

   The raison d’etre behind all this numbskullery in our supposedly advanced species appears to be that our mind don’t work they way we think they do. My picture was of the mind as a capacious jug with elastic sides which expands as we learn more; or given that skulls are solid bone, perhaps we just access more of the brain’s unused data space. 

   Not so. It appears, to reduce it to a literal analogy, to be more like a balloon, which will enlarge. But how do you get in? The answer is you don’t without dismantling the balloon, accumulating more content and growing a new balloon. Therein lies the rub. People rightly resist the process of dismantling their protective psychological cover for fear that the whole house of cards will tumble, leading to implosion. 

   Information which is not familiar is threatening, thereby leading to the confirmation bias. We cherry pick what reinforces our beliefs and blank out the rest. 

  Some stalwart souls do have an epiphany along the way which flips their politics from hard left to right; even one scientist who was a fervent campaigner against genetically modified crops until he studied deeper and found there was no proof for his previous stance. 

  Humiliation, of course, play its part in preventing a climb- down to admit the hated other might be right or partially right. We are all emperors within our own little bubbles, so any suggestion we might be wrong brings cracks in our grandiose delusion and with it corrosive shame. 

  There’s no real conclusion to all of this except to hop back to Schopenhauer – dig in for a long war and don’t give up. I just like to know the reasons why – makes the irritation easier to bear. 

Follow me on:
BUY my new crime thriller BY the LIGHT of a LIE at: www.marjorieorr.com