Sunday 13 May 2018

Why do we find fictional scoundrels so attractive?


Rooting for the bad guy is a delicious pleasure and that’s not just my warped sense of values. Popular drama and fiction are awash with anti-heroes who inveigled their way into our hearts. We cheerlead their lack of morals in stark contradiction to current snowflakey pc sensitivities. 

   I love paradoxes. How we tie ourselves in knots holding two polar opposite viewpoints at the same time. One digressionary example from the height of feminism’s second wave - female cinema audiences of Gladiator swooning over Russell Crowe in a very short leather kilt growling ‘Give them hell.’ We’re Amazons but please can we have one of him as well.

    Back to the real louses of whom there are myriad examples from Jane Eyre’s Mr Rochester, Wuthering Heights’ Heathcliffe, through to modern day George MacDonald Fraser’s Flashman, James Bond, even Lee Child’s killing-solves-the-problem Jack Reacher. There’s an even more fervent fandom in television addicted to the Mafia Sopranos, meth-cooking Walter White in Breaking Bad, snakey politician Frank Urquhart in House of Cards (until Kevin Spacey turned out to be a really bad guy), gypsy gangster Peaky Blinders and money-laundering McMafia. 

  It struck me forcibly this week watching Billions (best thing on the box at the moment) showcasing Bobby Axelrod, an amoral billionaire hedge-funder (Damian Lewis) and Chuck Rhoades, a ruthless, corner-cutting US Attorney (Paul Giamatti). They are lionised as they both cheat, lie, manipulate, indulge in egregious criminal felonies to wriggle out of trouble, with the audience willing them to succeed.  

   A financier and a scumbag lawyer? Two of the most hated species on the planet and we don’t want them to get their comeuppance.  The one decent character who grasps the full horror of their sins comes across as a sap and he isn’t winning.  Scrape off the millimetre top layer of civilized behaviour, which murmurs pious words about justice and fairness, and up pops gleeful envy of the rule-breakers.

   Although maybe that only lives and breathes in fantasy land. In real life, there’s precious little attractive about the sharp practices of the obscenely wealthy ones, Mafiosa brutality, drug dealers, the #metoo offenders, let alone the present US President’s multifarious malfeasances (I’m not going there).

   Usually there’s a back story that evokes sympathy. Poor childhood followed by an anything-goes struggle to make good in an unfair world. Or doing the wrong thing for the right reasons – terminally-ill Walter White providing for his family allows us to blank out the damage wreaked by his money-making meth. 

  
 Living by society’s strictures – law, order and fairness – provides communal cohesion. But clearly in great swathes of the population there’s an inner anarchist and gangster  lurking below the surface that needs an outlet. The absolute joy of casting off the Ten Commandments, being wicked and getting away with it. We covet our fictional heroes’ risk-taking bravado, their chutzpah in assuming rules weren’t made for them. A vicarious pleasure since deep down we know if we tried it there would be instant retribution.

Follow me on:
BUY my new crime thriller BY the LIGHT of a LIE at: www.marjorieorr.com

No comments:

Post a Comment